Snap Fit
Design
Snap fits
are commonly used as an assembly method for injection molded parts. Although they have been around for many
years, they have recently become more important in an attempt to simplify
assembly and its associated costs. Snap fits
are very useful because they eliminate screws, clips, adhesives, or other
joining methods. The snaps are molded
into the product, so additional parts are not needed to join them together. Additionally, if designed correctly, they can
be disassembled and reassembled several times without any problems. A snap fit can either be designed as a
permanent snap or a multiple snap.
Permanent fits are used in disposable parts that are never meant to be
disassembled. Multiple snaps are used in
most designs where disassembly for service is expected.
There are
complications associated with snap fits.
A lot more engineering is required to design a proper snap fit than
designing something for screw assembly.
Snap fits can also make the injection mold that produces the parts
significantly more complicated and expensive.
Generally, the savings in assembly costs more than makes up for added
cost and complexity of the mold.
There are
three main types of snap fits: annular,
cantilever, and torsional.
Annular Snap Fits

Figures 1 through 3 show examples of annular snap fits. Because there is so much hoop strain when the
parts are assembled, usually only materials with a large elongation at yield
are able to be used. See the calculation
section for formulas to calculate the maximum deflections of the fit.
Cantilever Snap Fits
Cantilever
snap fits are the most widely used type of snap fit. There is a considerable amount of calculation
and engineering that goes into designing a good
snap
fit; this section will show different design techniques. Refer to the calculation section to find the
specific dimensions for the cantilever.
Figure 4
shows four different methods of designing snap fits for disassembly. Figure 4a shows a snap fit with a 90° hook and a 90° recess;
this permanent fit cannot be disassembled.
Figure 4b uses an angled surface for both the assembly and disassembly
portions of the cantilever and the recess.
The cap can be removed with the same force used in assembly. Figure 4c has the same 90 angles as 4a, but
the designer put a window in the side to allow the snap fit to put disengaged
for disassembly. Figure 4d uses a U type
beam to disengage the snap from the outside.
A potential
problem with the design shown in Figure 4c is that the snap fit can be pushed
too far; there is no stop. If a snap fit
breaks, it is usually impossible to repair it, so designers will commonly put a
stop behind it to prevent it from being overstrained. Figure 4d's design has a stop incorporated
into the design (the cantilever can only be pushed so far).
Figure 5 shows the mechanism of a
cantilever snap fit, and how both assembly and separation can be achieved by
using angled surfaces on the snap and the engaging piece of the recess.
U shaped cantilever snap fits are
commonly used in such places as battery doors and covers. Figure 6 shows how this type of snap fit
works. With this type of snap fit, the
plastic does not experience a lot strain, so multiple flexes are possible
without damaging the plastic beam. It
also has a built-in stop, so the beam cannot be flexed too much and
damaged.
A problem with joining two plastic
pieces together is holding a high tolerance on the snap fits so that a tight
fit is achieved. With snap fits, when
joining two pieces together as shown in Figure 7, there is no way to get any
preload on the cantilever snap. This is
a major disadvantage of using snap fits over screws. One way to get around this is to sandwich an
elastomeric materials between the mating pieces, as shown in Figure 7. The plastic pieces are pressed together,
compressing the elastomeric component and engaging the snap fit. The compressed component acts as a spring and
gives preload to the snap, resulting in a tight assembly. The elastomeric component can also act as a
gasket to keep out dust, water, or other contaminants.
Molding Snap Fits

As stated
at the beginning of this section, adding snap fits can significantly increase the
complexity and cost of the mold. It is
important to understand the implications of the part design on the moldability
of the part. Many times, seemingly minor
part design changes can greatly decrease mold complexity.
Figure 9 shows a part with cantilever snap fits that point outward. This does not present a molding problem, since the part can be ejected with no special mold action. If the snaps are turned around the other way, however, the mold design becomes much more complicated. The snaps will hold onto the mold core, keeping it from ejecting. Figure 10 shows the situation with inward-facing snaps. A possible solution to this problem would be to design the snap fit with angled corners so it can deflect and slide off as it is ejected. Unfortunately, deflecting the plastic when it hot (immediately after molding) could cause some permanent deformation. It would be very difficult to hold tight tolerances on the snap fit using this method.
A similar problem is experienced with
an internal snap fit. As seen in Figure
11, this part cannot be ejected with simple ejection methods. A mold component called a lifter is required
to release the snap during ejection. The
back of the lifter is attached to a slide on the ejector plate. During ejection, the ejector plate moves
forward, forcing the lifter forward as well.
The lifter travels along an angled mold surface and releases the snap
fit once it moves out far enough.
Although it is fairly simple, the addition of lifters to a mold can
greatly increase its cost, and should be avoided if possible. Also note that the lifter travels across the
surface of the part during ejection.
There cannot be any part features in this area because they will get in
the way of the lifter.
An easy and elegant way to eliminate
the need for a lifter to release a snap fit is to put a window at its base, as
shown in Figure 12. The window
eliminates the undercut formed by the hook, and allows the hook to be formed by
the cavity side of the mold. Figure 13
shows a cross section of the mold at the window. The underside of the snap is formed through
the slot. This mold does not require any
special type of ejection. This design
can only be used on a part where a hole in the surface is not functionally or
aesthetically undesirable.

( Figures 1 comes from Paul A. Tres's
book "Designing Plastic Parts for Assembly 2nd, Revised Edition." You
can purchase his book at http://ets-corp.com/lectures/dppa/dppa.htm
. )